Creating Healthy Communities / Reducing Poverty2022-02-10T12:13:41-08:00

Nearly one out of five Californians live in poverty.1

Poverty affects the ability to live a healthy life by limiting access to the basic necessities of housing, food, education, jobs, healthcare, and transportation. Low-income persons frequently live in under-resourced neighborhoods and are often exposed to unfavorable conditions that affect health across the life course. Children in poor families are at greater risk of growing up in environments that are harmful to their development, health, and prospects for a high-quality education. Poverty is associated with societal exclusion and higher prevalence of mental illness. People experiencing poverty are more likely to suffer from chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, acute and chronic stress, and to die prematurely.2

There are many ways to measure poverty. The California Poverty Measure (CPM) tracks the percentage of residents living in poverty, taking into account income, cost of living, and social safety net services.

Poverty

In 2017-19 (baseline time range), 16.4% of Californians lived in poverty. The most recent rate available is 16.4% (2017-19). The target is to be determined (TBD) for this indicator.

More Data about Poverty

Baseline

16.4%

Current Rate

16.4%

Target

TBD

Indicator Highlights

Meeting Basic Needs

Nearly one in five Californians—about 7.4 million people—lacked sufficient financial resources to meet basic needs.3

Housing Cost Burden

Among Californians in poverty, 68.4 percent spend more than 50 percent of net family resources on housing.4

Working Poor

Most poor families in California are working families. Nearly four in five poor Californians lived in families with at least one working adult.3

Without social safety net programs, more Californians would live in poverty, especially in the Inland Empire, Central Valley and Sierra. The largest social safety net programs kept an estimated 7.8% of Californians out of poverty.3

Safety net programs reduce poverty much more in inland areas: if we subtract these resources from family budgets, 13.9% more people in the Central Valley and Sierra would be poor, compared with 4.0% more in the Bay Area.3

Data Snapshot: Trends & Disparities

26.1% of Latinos lived in poverty, compared with 18.9% of African Americans, 17.6% of Asian Americans, and 13.5% of whites.3

Though poverty among Latinos is down from 30.9% in 2011, Latinos remain disproportionately poor (making up 52.8% of poor Californians but 39.2% of all Californians).3

The counties of Los Angeles (24.3%) and Santa Cruz (23.8%) had the highest poverty rates in California. El Dorado County had the lowest rate, at 11.8%. Rates vary even more widely (from 7.8% to 40.7%) across state assembly, state senate, and US congressional districts.3

There are disparities in poverty rates based on educational attainment. The rate for adults age 25–64 with a college degree was 8.4%, compared with 34.5% for those without a high school diploma.3

Poverty rates are highest for children—about 1.9 million—live in poverty in California.5

Percent of Residents Living in Poverty Based on California Poverty Measure, by County and Legislative District

Percent of Residents Living in Poverty Based on California Poverty Measure, by Demographic Category

|

Indicator Name: Percentage of Residents Living in Poverty

Indicator Description: The California Poverty Measure (CPM), a joint research effort by PPIC and the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality, draws on administrative and survey data to deliver a more comprehensive measure of poverty.6 It accounts for the cost of living and a range of family needs and resources, including social safety net benefits. The California Poverty Measure incorporates the changes in costs and standards of living since the official poverty measure was devised in the early 1960s—and accounts for geographic differences in the cost of living across the state. It also factors in tax credits and in-kind assistance that can augment family resources and subtracts medical, commuting, and child care expenses.

Data Limitations: https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/CPM-2014_technical-appendix.pdf

Indicator Source: Public Policy Institute of California and Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality

Indicator Calculation Methodology: https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/CPM-2014_technical-appendix.pdf

Data Collection Methodology: https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/CPM-2014_technical-appendix.pdf

Program URL Link: https://www.ppic.org/map/california-poverty-by-county-and-legislative-district/

Reporting Cycle: Annual

Reporting Lag: 2 years

1. Public Policy Institute of California. (2019). California Poverty by County and Legislative District. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from PPIC.org: https://www.ppic.org/map/california-poverty-by-county-and-legislative-district/

2. Office of Health Equity. (March 2014). Healthy Communities Data and Indicators Project. California Department of Public Health, from: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/CDPH%20Document%20Library/HCI/ADA%20Compliant%20Documents/HCI_PovertyRate_754_Narrative_Examples11-5-13rev3-12-14-ADA.pdf

3. Public Policy Institute of California. (2019). Poverty in California. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from PPIC.org: https://www.ppic.org/publication/poverty-in-california/

4. Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality. (October 2017). California’s Poverty Rate Goes Down, but 7.5 Million Remain Poor. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from: https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/california_poverty_measure_2015.pdf

5. Public Policy Institute of California. (2019). Child Poverty in California. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from PPIC.org: https://www.ppic.org/publication/child-poverty-in-california/

Stories & Solutions

Share Your Story

Want to engage in moving the dial in Creating Healthy Communities? Share your impact story!

Submit Your Story

Go to Top