Healthy Beginnings / Reducing Adverse Childhood Experiences

Adverse Childhood Experiences2022-07-05T09:33:27-07:00

Adverse childhood experiences have a lasting, harmful effect on health and wellbeing.1

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) affect nearly two million children in California across socioeconomic lines, putting them at risk for health, behavioral, and learning problems.2 ACEs are traumatic childhood experiences - which include abuse, neglect, and being exposed to violence, mental illness, divorce, substance abuse, or criminal activity in the home - that often leave people more vulnerable to environments and behaviors that can lead to poor health. The more ACEs an individual has experienced, the higher their risk climbs.3

The National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) tracks the percent of California children who have experienced ACEs. It uses a set of questions on family, economic, and community adversity to ask parents about current adverse experiences to which their children have been exposed. This population-based survey measures adversity among California children by asking parents about the trauma their children have experienced while they are still children, compared to methods that ask adults to recall their childhood experiences, such as adult retrospective data from the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).2,4

Adverse Childhood Experiences (Parent Reported)

In 2016-2019 (baseline year), 36.0% of children are exposed to one or more adverse experience (parent reported). The most recent data available (2016-2019) show 36.0%. The target is to be determined (TBD) for this indicator.

More Data about Adverse Childhood Experiences (Parent Reported)

Baseline

36.0%

Current Rate

36.0%

Target

TBD

Adverse Childhood Experiences (Adult Retrospective)

In 2008-2009 (baseline year), 59.0% of adults reported having been exposed to one or more adverse childhood experience before the age of 18. The most recent data available (2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017 aggregate) show 62.0%. This indicator serves to inform and consequently does not have a target.

More Data about Adverse Childhood Experiences (Adult Retrospective)

Baseline

59.0%

Current Rate

63.5%

Target

-

Indicator Highlights

Data Snapshot: Trends & Disparities

Proportion of Children Who Are Exposed to Adverse Experiences (Parent Reported)

Proportion of Respondents Who Have Been Exposed to Adverse Childhood Experiences Before the Age of 18 (Adult Retrospective)

|

Childhood adversity and resilience measures originate from two separate data sources and provide a rich and conceptually-related perspective on childhood adversity. However, due to differences in methodology, data from the two sources should not be directly compared.

Indicator: Proportion of children who are exposed to one or more adverse experience (parent reported)

Description: The Your Family and Household module of the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) is sponsored by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA) Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB). The survey asks adult respondents questions about their child’s physical and emotional health and well-being before the age of 18. Question topics specifically addressing ACES include asking if their child: experienced economic hardship; was treated unfairly because of race; had a parent or guardian divorced; had a parent or guardian die; had a parent or guardian spend time in jail; had and adult slap, hit kick, or punch them; was a victim of violence; lived with someone mentally ill; lived with a person with an alcohol or drug problem. A cumulative ACEs score is calculated for each respondent by counting the number of these items that a respondent reported experiencing, creating a score ranging from 0 to 9.

Data Limitations: The ACEs module captures adverse childhood experiences by asking parents about their child’s exposures. Limitations include: 1) relies on self-reported information, 2) provides prevalence, not incidence data, 3) based on population survey and are subject to both sampling and non-sampling error, 4) NSCH dataset designed to provide state-level population health estimates, sub-state estimates have been modeled by the population reference bureau (kidsdata.org) using American Community Survey data, and are independent and not controlled to state totals. The data methodology for this indicator helps form a more comprehensive picture and differs from LGHCs other ACEs indicator. Data from the two should not be compared directly.

Indicator Source: National Survey of Children’s Health

Indicator Calculation Methodology: 9 questions about ACEs are condensed into an ordinal scale from 0 to 9 possible ACEs. This indicator shows the prevalence of children whose guardian/parent reported their child had one or more ACEs. Sub-state estimates have been modeled by the population reference bureau (kidsdata.org) using American Community Survey data and are independent and not controlled to state totals.

Data Collection Methodology:
Census NSCH Data Documentation; NSCH Methodology Report Sept. 2020 ; https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/nsch/technical-documentation/complete-technical-documentation.html

Program URL Link:
National Survey of Children’s Health (Data): https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/nsch.html

Population Reference Bureau (Analysis): https://kidsdata.org

California Department of Public Health Safe and Active Communities Branch (Review): https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/Pages/DivisionofChronicDiseaseandInjuryControl.aspx

Reporting Cycle:  Annual Survey, but results are aggregated into 4-year estimates

Reporting Lag:  3 years

======================================================

Indicator: Proportion of adults reporting having been exposed to one or more adverse childhood experience before the age of 18 (adult retrospective)

Description: The ACEs module of the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS) asks respondents questions about eight different traumatic childhood experiences that occurred before the age of 18. These include verbal/emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and negative household situations including the incarceration of an adult, alcohol or drug abuse by an adult, violence between adults, mental illness of a household member, and parental divorce or separation. A cumulative ACEs score is calculated for each respondent by counting the number of these items that a respondent reported experiencing, creating a score ranging from 0 to 8.

Data Limitations: The ACEs module is a “lagging” indicator capturing childhood experiences retrospectively by asking adults 18+ years of age. Additional limitations include: 1) relies on self-reported information, 2) provides prevalence, not incidence data, 3) bias or measurement error associated with telephone-administered survey of a sample of the population (e.g., response bias, sampling variation), 4) BRFSS data designed to provide state-level population health estimates and does not provide sub-state estimates or estimates by racial sub-groups (e.g., Asian sub-groups) unless multiple years are combined. The data methodology for this indicator helps form a more comprehensive picture and differs from LGHCs other ACEs indicator. Data from the two should not be compared directly. California ACEs module results were collected on a bi-annual basis (2011, 2013…) until 2017, with the next data release being 2020.

Indicator Source: California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

Indicator Calculation Methodology: 11 questions about ACEs are condensed into an ordinal scale from 0 to 8 possible ACEs. This indicator shows the prevalence of adults who reported having one or more ACEs. Other data cuts are also available, e.g., 3 or more ACEs.

Data Collection Methodology:
CDC BRFSS Data Documentation 2013; BRFSS User Guide June 2013; https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_documentation/index.htm

Program URL Link:
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (Data): https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/ace-brfss.html

Population Reference Bureau (Analysis): https://kidsdata.org

California Department of Public Health Safe and Active Communities Branch (Review): https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/Pages/DivisionofChronicDiseaseandInjuryControl.aspx

Reporting Cycle:  Annual Survey, but ACES measures collected every 2 years in California. Results are aggregated into a single estimate

Reporting Lag:  2 years

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention (2020). About the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/about.html.

2. Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. 2017-2018 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data query. Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB). Retrieved September 21, 2020, from www.childhealthdata.org.

3. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health, 2, e356–66. Retrieved fromhttps://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(17)30118-4/fulltext.

4. Center for Youth Wellness (n.d.). Data report: a hidden crisis: findings on adverse childhood experiences in California. Retrieved from https://centerforyouthwellness.org/wp-content/themes/cyw/build/img/building-a-movement/hidden-crisis.pdf.

5. Middlebrooks, J.S., & Audage, N.C. (2008). The effects of childhood stress on health across the lifespan. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6978.

6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). Supporting infants, toddlers, and families impacted by caregiver mental health problems, substance abuse, and trauma: a community action guide. DHHS Publication No. SMA-12-4726. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/product/supporting-infants-toddlers-families-impacted-caregiver-mental-health-problems-substance/SMA12-4726.

7. Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Public Health, Office of Policy and Practice Alignment (2018). Wisconsin State Health Improvement Plan. Retrieved from https://healthy.wisconsin.gov/content/aces.

8. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). The road to resilience. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx.

9. Egerter, S., Barclay, C., Grossman-Kahn, R., & Braveman, P. (2011). How social factors shape health: violence, social disadvantage and health. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.preventioninstitute.org/publications/how-social-factors-shape-health-violence-social-disadvantage-and-health.

10. California Department Public Health, Injury and Violence Prevention Branch and the California Department of Social Services, Office of Child Abuse Prevention, California Essentials for Childhood Initiative, the University of California, Davis Violence Prevention Research Program, the University of California, Firearm Violence Research Center. Adverse Childhood Experiences Data Report: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2011-2017: An Overview of Adverse Childhood Experiences in California. CA: California Department of Public Health and the California Department of Social Services; 2020. Retrieved from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/SACB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Essentials%20for%20Childhood%20Initiative/ACEs-BRFSS-Update_final%2010.26.20.pdf.

11. California Department Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division. Maternal & Infant Health Assessment (MIHA). Retrieved fromhttps://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DMCAH/MIHA/Pages/default.aspx.

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ACE Data. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/ace-brfss.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fviolenceprevention%2Facestudy%2Face-brfss.html.

Stories & Solutions

First 5 Initiative

First 5 California understands that today's parents face many challenges and tough choices as they raise their kids. At First 5 California, we fund programs that educate parents, grandparents, caregivers, and teachers about the critical role they play during a child’s first five years. Since our creation in 1998, we’ve [...]

Raising of America

The Raising of America is the first national, fully integrated media/public engagement project that aims to reframe the way Americans look at early child health and development. The Raising of America Campaign films and resources are being used by hundreds of organizations concerned about the futures of young children and [...]

Essentials for Childhood Initiative

The California Essentials for Childhood Initiative addresses child maltreatment as a public health issue and aims to 1) raise awareness and commitment to promote safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments; 2) create the context for healthy children and families through social norms change, programs and policies; and 3) uses data [...]

Share Your Story

Want to engage in moving the dial on Healthy Beginnings? Share your impact story!

Submit Your Story

Go to Top